💡
17
c/astronomy-photos•paige331paige331•2mo ago

Driving out to the desert near Joshua Tree showed me the real cost of light pollution

I went camping about 30 miles east of Joshua Tree last month, hoping to get some Milky Way shots. The difference from my backyard in the suburbs was crazy. At home, I'm lucky to see a handful of stars, but out there, the sky was so full it looked fake. I set up my star tracker and a basic 24mm lens, and in a single 3-minute exposure, I caught the Lagoon Nebula as a clear pink smudge. I didn't even need a telescope. It made me realize my main issue wasn't my gear, it was just being in the wrong place. The dark sky map online said it was a Bortle Class 2 zone, and now I get why people chase those numbers. Has anyone else had a shot completely transformed just by driving a couple hours away from city lights?
4 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
4 Comments
jakejones
jakejones2mo ago
Man, I read this article about how light pollution is actually messing with animals, not just our star views. Like birds flying into buildings and bugs dying off cause they can't tell night from day. It's way bigger than just a hobbyist problem. Your photo story really shows how much we're missing. Makes me want to plan a trip out there too.
4
robin591
robin5911mo ago
Right? It's wild how much it messes with nature. I went camping last fall and the difference in bug noise alone was crazy, way more life out there in the real dark.
3
luna_wright
That Bortle scale is just for hobbyists though.
3
karen_sanchez49
Actually, chasing dark skies feels like a luxury when most people can't even see the basic constellations from home anymore.
3