8
TIL the FBI's own lab reports from the 90s got challenged in 3 major cases
I was digging through old court documents last night and found out that the FBI's hair analysis unit had flawed results in over 90% of cases they reviewed. This was from a 2015 report by the Innocence Project, not some random blog. How do we trust any of those older convictions when the evidence was that shaky?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
olivia_moore14d ago
That the FBI's own lab reports from the 90s got challenged in 3 major cases" is wild, but the real problem is it wasn't just three cases. That 2015 review found flawed testimony in 268 trials, with 32 people getting death sentences based on it. So when you say "how do we trust any of those older convictions," the answer is we probably can't. That hair analysis stuff was treated like gold in courtrooms for decades, and now we know it was basically just a guessing game dressed up in lab coats. Makes you wonder how many other forensic methods we're still treating like facts that'll get blown up in ten years.
4
murphy.aaron12d ago
Can you believe they actually used that hair stuff to put people on death row? My buddy Dave was a forensic tech trainee back in the late 90s, and he told me how they'd just grab a few strands, put 'em under a microscope, and say "yep, that's a match" with zero actual science backing it up. He said the pressure from prosecutors to get convictions was SO intense that nobody questioned it, like they all just wanted to close cases. Once he left the field and read the actual studies years later, he called me totally shook, saying he felt sick about the cases he worked on. That kind of thing has to haunt people forever, knowing their word meant somebody got locked up for life over a hunch.
8
avery_jackson14d ago
Didn't I used to defend hair analysis as solid science back in law school? I remember arguing with a friend about how forensic evidence was ironclad, and now this feels like a gut punch. It really makes you step back and question everything we think we know about evidence.
2